Compare one complete operating cycle
01Start with a lead and customer commitment, then show the purchasing or stock requirement, fulfilment, invoice, payment, and reconciliation. Add the exceptions your team handles regularly: changed quantities, partial receipts, returns, overdue balances, and corrections. In both platforms, inspect the source record, role permission, approval, and final report. Record any configuration, integration, or additional work needed to complete the scenario.
Compare agent actions and controls, not just AI labels
02Tellency’s action catalogue includes purchase orders, goods receipts, quotations, sales orders, invoices and customer records. Ask an agent to carry out a representative request, then inspect the selected records, required inputs, resulting document and status. Demonstrate role permissions, a refused action, an approval decision and execution records. Ask both vendors to show the exact AI capabilities available in the proposed edition and configuration; this comparison does not assume that either platform lacks agents or that AI labels prove equivalent scope.
Test depth where it matters to your business
03For a manufacturer, demonstrate the work order and a failed inspection, then review the rework or scrap outcome and financial transaction. For a retailer or distributor, demonstrate stock moving between locations, a customer return, and the balances associated with a gift card or layaway purchase. Define specific acceptance tests for planning calculations, costing, reporting, devices, and integrations rather than treating a module name as proof.
Put enterprise requirements in the demonstration
04Bring entity boundaries, currencies, approval rules, segregation of duties, data volumes, reporting, integrations, and recovery expectations. Confirm the exact workflow and the proposed environment for each. Tellency should be evaluated on that evidence, not dismissed by a headcount label or assumed to match every capability in another suite. High-volume, consolidation, foreign-currency revaluation, and specialist reporting requirements need their own demonstration and scope.
Evaluate the regions in which you operate
05Use a separate checklist for US and Canadian requirements and for each Asian or MENA jurisdiction in your rollout. Demonstrate the required documents, languages, payroll outputs, tax treatment, invoicing connections, and submission responsibilities with your advisers and implementation team. A regional landing page, invoice screen, or accounting module alone does not establish local compliance or statutory filing support.
Compare the complete commercial proposal
06Use the same user counts, modules, environments, migration requirements, support expectations, and integration list in both proposals. Separate platform fees from implementation, hosting, support, custom work, third-party services, and AI usage. Ask about renewals, user changes, data exports, and administration. Tellency platform pricing starts at $79 USD per user per month; that figure is not an all-in implementation price or a quantified saving against NetSuite.
Agree implementation from readiness, not a slogan
07Define which records and history will move, how accounts and items map, and the trial balance, aged balances, bank positions, and stock totals that must reconcile. Include role-based training, integration failures, cutover authority, and recovery arrangements in the acceptance plan. Tellency typically uses around eight weeks as a planning reference; the actual schedule depends on discovery, scope, data quality, configuration, and acceptance.